Post by account_disabled on Dec 31, 2023 23:30:30 GMT -5
Anot only in the Member State of origin of the website in question but also in the other Member States and in particular in France which would allow the jurisdiction of the French court to be justified. The referring court considers that the dispute with which it is referred presents the particularity that it does not correspond to any of the hypotheses already addressed by the Court in its jurisprudence regarding Article point of Regulation no. . Thus the action pursued would seek to put an end to the damages claimed by an authorized distributor established in.
France and which operates an online sales website damages resulting from the Country Email List violation of the ban on the resale of products outside the selective distribution network of which it is a part and from resorting to sales offers made available online in an electronic market on various websites operated in France and in other Member States prohibited by the selective distribution contract in question. In these circumstances the Cour de cassation Court of Cassation France decided to suspend the trial of the case and address the following preliminary question to the Court Article point of Regulation no. must be interpreted in the sense that in the event of an alleged violation of the.
Resale prohibitions outside a selective distribution network and through an electronic market by means of sales offers made available online on several websites operated in different Member States does the authorized distributor who considers himself prejudiced have the possibility to bring an action to stop the resulting unlawful disturbance before the court in whose territorial area the information necessary to have another connecting criterion The legal framework Union law From consideration of Regulation no. it appears that it aimed for the smooth functioning of the internal market the adoption of provisions to unify the rules relating to conflicts of jurisdiction.
France and which operates an online sales website damages resulting from the Country Email List violation of the ban on the resale of products outside the selective distribution network of which it is a part and from resorting to sales offers made available online in an electronic market on various websites operated in France and in other Member States prohibited by the selective distribution contract in question. In these circumstances the Cour de cassation Court of Cassation France decided to suspend the trial of the case and address the following preliminary question to the Court Article point of Regulation no. must be interpreted in the sense that in the event of an alleged violation of the.
Resale prohibitions outside a selective distribution network and through an electronic market by means of sales offers made available online on several websites operated in different Member States does the authorized distributor who considers himself prejudiced have the possibility to bring an action to stop the resulting unlawful disturbance before the court in whose territorial area the information necessary to have another connecting criterion The legal framework Union law From consideration of Regulation no. it appears that it aimed for the smooth functioning of the internal market the adoption of provisions to unify the rules relating to conflicts of jurisdiction.