Post by afsanajahan88 on May 19, 2024 23:53:53 GMT -5
With whom Cristina Kirchner publicly clashed: In Deputies, the space that she leads initiated a trial against the four members of the Court, in order to fire them alleging that they had three rulings that responded to “interests”. “political” and not legal principles. They are resolutions whose final results did not please Kirchnerism and were used as elements of accusation. Without Cristina Kirchner exercising the presidency of the Senate and with a new conformation of the Upper House, this proposal has the only destiny of being shipwrecked, like many other initiatives that the current government promoted against the Judiciary, such as the expansion of the Court to 25 members.
Without any legal explanation, only political Taiwan Email List foundations" they responded in a clear play on words in Talcahuano Street Palace. The Court must decide whether the vice president will sit in the dock again for two more corruption cases. One that he shares with her son Máximo Kirchner who, unlike her, will have competition. Hotesur-Los Sauces is a file in which - once again - Lázaro Báez was key, for what the justice system determined were money laundering maneuvers.
The second file, more sensitive at a political-international level, refers to the Pact with Iran, the investigation that began with the complaint of the deceased prosecutor Alberto Nisman and where it is processed and sent to oral trial for the crime of aggravated cover-up of the attack. to the AMIA. It was Chamber I of the Federal Cassation that reopened both files where Cristina Kirchner -and the other defendants- had been dismissed. The immediate consequence was the order to hold the respective oral trials.